Israel and Hezbollah agree ceasefire after escalation threatens US-Iran deal
Submitted by
Adam Chamseddine
on
Fri, 06/19/2026 - 13:36
Israeli strikes kill at least 47 people, as Hezbollah ambush troops near strategic Ali al-Taher point
Smoke billows from southern Lebanon following an Israeli strike, as seen from Nabatieh, southern Lebanon, on 19 June 2026 (Reuters)
Off
Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire on Friday, after a sharp escalation in fighting threatened to unravel a fragile regional truce, a day after the United States and Iran signed an agreement to end the war.
A source familiar with Hezbollah confirmed to Middle East Eye that the ceasefire, which went into effect at 4pm local time, was reached after intensive calls and deliberations led by the US and Iran.
The source said the agreement came after Tehran threatened not to attend talks with the US in Geneva following the Israeli attacks in Lebanon.
"The ceasefire is contingent on Israel adhering to it," he said.
A senior Israeli official told Reuters that Israel and Hezbollah were in a ceasefire as long as Hezbollah does not attack Israel, adding that Israeli forces would stay in areas they have occupied in south Lebanon.
Fighting in Lebanon intensified on Thursday night, when Hezbollah attacked Israeli forces attempting to advance near Ali al-Taher, a highly strategic position close to the southern city of Nabatieh.
The Israeli military said four soldiers, including a battalion commander, were killed and several others wounded. Hezbollah said its fighters had carried out ambushes and drone attacks against Israeli troops advancing through the area.
Israel responded with a wide wave of air strikes across southern and eastern Lebanon, saying it struck more than 80 targets.
Lebanon's health ministry said at least 47 people were killed and 39 wounded in strikes on 11 towns since midnight.
The ministry said the ongoing bombardment was obstructing rescue operations and warned that the number of casualties was expected to rise.
Seven people were killed in Harouf, a village in southern Lebanon, while others were believed to be trapped beneath the rubble, health ministry sources told MEE.
Lebanon's state-run National News Agency reported heavy displacement from the southern districts of Tyre and Bint Jbeil, with residents fleeing north as Israeli attacks intensified. Many of those fleeing had only recently returned to their villages following the US-Iran interim agreement reached on Monday.
The Israeli strikes were among the deadliest since Washington and Tehran announced the deal intended to halt fighting across the region, including in Lebanon.
Battle for Ali al-Taher
A second source familiar with Hezbollah told MEE that the scale and geographical spread of Israel's latest attacks indicated that the attacks were not simply retaliation for the deaths of the Israeli soldiers as it claimed.
"Israel wants to sabotage the agreement reached between the US and Iran," the source said.
The memorandum of understanding agreed between the US and Iran has provoked outrage in Israel, where it is widely seen as handing an effective victory to Tehran.
"What is happening has nothing to do with the ambush its forces encountered after attempting to approach the strategically important Ali al-Taher position, near the city of Nabatieh.
Ceasefires and construction: Satellite images reveal how Israel is cementing its presence in Lebanon and Syria
»
"If this were merely a response to the ambush, then why did Israel also strike Baalbek and the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon?"
According to the source, Israeli troop movements, advances and bombardment suggested that the military was attempting to seize Ali al-Taher.
The position overlooks large parts of the Nabatieh district and the Iqlim al-Tuffah region, giving whoever controls it a commanding view of a significant stretch of southern Lebanon.
"Israel considers it strategically significant because of its location within the area it is attempting to control, which it has described as the 'Yellow Line'," the source said.
"Control of this position would allow Israel to overlook the entirety of the Nabatieh district and the Iqlim area, as part of an attempt to consolidate its presence in the same territory it occupied before Lebanon's liberation in 2000."
The escalation came a day after Israel published a map showing an expanded area of military deployment in southern Lebanon, extending towards the outskirts of Nabatieh, north of the Litani River.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz emphasised the territorial nature of the operation in an interview on Israeli television, saying that the most important military objective was to hold territory.
Katz said the Israeli military was destroying villages in areas it occupied and would not permit residents to return.
"The 200,000 residents who lived in the security zone are not returning. None of them are returning," he said.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had ordered attacks against dozens of Hezbollah targets following the deaths of the four soldiers. He added that Israeli forces would remain inside the southern Lebanon security zone "for as long as necessary".
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, meanwhile, struck an inflammatory tone, declaring that "all of Lebanon must burn".
US-Israel disagreement
Asked whether Hezbollah believed Israel was escalating with US approval, the second source said the group increasingly regarded the disagreement between Netanyahu's government and the US administration as genuine.
That assessment contrasts with a longstanding belief among Hezbollah supporters that public disagreements between Israel and the US often mask broad alignment on strategic objectives.
President Donald Trump said Washington expected a complete ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. France also called on the US to intervene to prevent the fighting from escalating further.
'Israel is weaker': Israeli political class reacts angrily to the US-Iran peace deal
»
The renewed violence on Friday disrupted diplomacy between Washington and Tehran as talks in Geneva were scrapped.
A third source familiar with Hezbollah said Tehran had assured the group it would not conclude a final agreement with Washington without provisions addressing Lebanon.
According to the source, Iran would not sign a deal unless there was "a complete and comprehensive cessation of hostilities against Lebanon across all Lebanese territory", alongside a commitment to a full Israeli withdrawal.
Asked whether indirect communication between Hezbollah and the US was continuing, the source said he would "neither confirm nor deny" that such contacts were taking place.
He added that when American officials wanted to communicate with Hezbollah, "they know exactly which channels to use".
Hezbollah rejects negotiations
Hezbollah accused Israel of repeatedly breaching both the Lebanon ceasefire, as well as the new US-Iran deal, as it continues to kill civilians, destroy villages and press ahead with its ground invasion.
The third source said Hezbollah is still opposed to further rounds of direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel in Washington, and did not consider itself bound by that process.
He added that the group had received several indications and messages suggesting that the US itself was no longer interested in, or committed to, the proposed negotiations.
The latest fighting has exposed the central divide underlying efforts to bring the conflict to an end.
Israel says it intends to retain territory and prevent displaced Lebanese residents from returning to the border region. Hezbollah says no final regional agreement can be accepted without an end to Israeli attacks and a complete withdrawal from Lebanon.
As thousands of residents again flee southern towns, the confrontation around Ali al-Taher has become both a battle over strategic territory and an immediate test for the US-Iran agreement negotiations.
War on Iran
Beirut
News
Post Date Override
0
Update Date
Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19
Update Date Override
0
